Vocabulary
odML
odML Terminologies
Terminologies for the odML metadata format, giving standard keys for describing electrophysiology experiments, subjects and hardware.
Source & access
- homepage g-node.github.io HTTP 200
- repository github.com HTTP 200
Automated evaluation
F Findable FAIR3/12
- Persistent identifier (F1)no PURL / w3id / DOI for the artefact0
- Indexed in services (F4)not indexed anywhere0
- Citable reference (F2)doi:10.3389/fninf.2011.00016+3
A Accessible FAIR9/12
- Homepage reachableHTTP 200+3
- Artefact retrievable over HTTP(S) (A1)repository HTTP 200+6
- Metadata persists in a registry (A2)not in Bioregistry or OBO Foundry0
I Interoperable FAIR0/12
- Formal machine-readable format (I1)none of: XML, JSON, YAML0
- Semantic-web IRIs (I2)no RDF/OWL/JSON-LD representation0
- References other vocabularies (I3)no imported vocabularies found0
R Reusable FAIR5/12
- Clear license (R1.1)BSD-3-Clause+5
- Release provenance (R1.2)no version in artefact, registry or release tags0
- Community standards (R1.3)no independent compliance report (not on the OBO Dashboard)0
Q Ontology consistency & qualityn/a
- Not applicablevocabulary without an OWL/OBO/RDF artefact; total scaled from 80 to 1000
M Maintenance0/16
- Recency2019-11-15 → 83.3 months (older / unknown)0
- Release cadence (12 months)0 releases0
U Community adoption3/16
- Documented adopting projects1 project+2
- Reused by other ontologies00
- Community signalmax(stars 4 → 0, citations 46 → 1)+1
P Penalties (inactivity & inconsistency)-20
- Time since last activity6.9 years → 4 × max(0, 6.9 − 1) (capped)-20
- Inactive statusnot archived, legacy or inactive0
FAIR subtotal 17/48 · earned 20/80 → scaled 25 − 20 inactivity = 5/100 → grade E
Community adoption 1
- NIX
Embedded metadata model
Curated by NeuroSchema
Know a project that uses odML? Suggest it.
History & changes 6 runs
Score over time
- Score: 5 → 1 · rubric v3.0 → v3.3
- Score: 18 → 5 · rubric v2.2 → v3.0
- Score: 38 → 18 · rubric v2.0 → v2.2
- Score: 44 → 38 · rubric v1.0 → v2.0
- Evaluated version: — → commit ff4108b
| Run | Score | FAIR | Version evaluated | Terms | Snapshot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 Oct 2026, 19:23 UTC | 1 E | 14 | commit ff4108b | — | JSON |
| 25 Oct 2026, 19:10 UTC | 5 E | 17 | commit ff4108b | — | JSON |
| 25 Oct 2026, 18:49 UTC | 5 D | 17 | commit ff4108b | — | JSON |
| 25 Oct 2026, 18:21 UTC | 18 D | 30 | commit ff4108b | — | JSON |
| 25 Oct 2026, 18:08 UTC | 38 D | 30 | commit ff4108b | — | JSON |
| 25 Oct 2026, 17:55 UTC | 44 D | — | — | — | JSON |
Provenance
Every fact on this page was fetched automatically. Each row shows where it came from and when. If a source fails, the last good value is kept and marked “carried forward”.
| Fact | Source | Retrieved |
|---|---|---|
| Homepage link check (HTTP 200) | g-node.github.io | 25 Oct 2026, 19:10 UTC |
| Repository link check (HTTP 200) | github.com | 25 Oct 2026, 19:10 UTC |
| Git refs (commit ff4108b) | github.com | 25 Oct 2026, 19:10 UTC |
| GitHub repository statistics | api.github.com | 25 Oct 2026, 19:10 UTC |
| Crossref citations (doi:10.3389/fninf.2011.00016) | api.crossref.org | 25 Oct 2026, 19:10 UTC |
Run 2026-10-25T19-10-16Z · evaluator v2.0.0 · rubric v3.0 · entry.json · run snapshot
How to cite
- A Bottom-up Approach to Data Annotation in Neurophysiology (2011) · doi:10.3389/fninf.2011.00016 · 46 citations